AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Quarterly review

3rd February 2011
Page 10
Page 10, 3rd February 2011 — Quarterly review
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

The fourth quarter of 2010 was a robust three months for many operators. Precisely half of all respondents reported that volumes in Q4 2010 increased either a little or a lot compared with Q4 2009, with 22% reporting that volumes were static. And nearly half (43%) said volumes were either a little or a lot better than expected, while 34% said volumes were on target.

That relatively healthy picture is backed by the fact that 39% said proit was either a little or a lot better in Q4 2010 compared with Q4 2009, while 19% found proit to be static. One third said proit was either a little or a lot better than expected, while 32% said it was on target.

Retail and wholesale distribution irms and those serving the manufacturing sector were among the best performers in Q4, with 54% and 59% respectively boasting volume hikes, while 42% and 40% enjoyed proit boosts.

Perhaps illustrating the cut-throat competitiveness of the sector, 57% of hauliers serving the agriculture sector enjoyed a boost in volumes, but a considerably lower 34% also gained a jump in proit.

Expectations for the current, irst quarter compared with Q1 2010 are measured: 40% and 36% expect volume and proit respec

tively to be either a little or a lot better. However, nearly a quarter (24%) expect a decline in volume, while 34% expect a fall in proit.

As ever, retail and wholesale distribution irms are more likely to see the light: 45% of them expect a volume increase and 49% a proit boost.

Hauliers serving agriculture are the least happy: only 17% expect increases in either volume or proit.

Tags


comments powered by Disqus