1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188 
The great debate
3rd August 2006, Page 26
3rd August 2006
Page 26
Page 26, 3rd August 2006
— The great debate
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
Should operators have incentives for moving to Euro-5 before the deadline? CM allows both sides to put forward their arguments.
The manufacturers have been at loggerheads over the benefits of Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) and Exhaust Gas Recirculation (EGR) technology and the related argument over whether incentives for operators to move to Euro-5 would be a good thing. So we invited them into the pages of CM for an old-fashioned debate. The motion: "It is in the interests of the market and the environment to encourage the early introduction of Euro-5 vehicles." For: Mercedes-Benz and Volvo. Against: MAN and Isuzu. You decide.