AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

HAULAGE DRIVERS AND CALLING-UP CONFUSION

3rd August 1940, Page 28
3rd August 1940
Page 28
Page 28, 3rd August 1940 — HAULAGE DRIVERS AND CALLING-UP CONFUSION
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

QOME of the troubles arising from inaccurate or incomplete registration of road-hauliers' employees under the Military Training Act were mentioned at a meeting of the Bradford and District Chamber of Trade's Transport Section, last week.

One case cited was that of an under30 driver of a vehicle with an unladen weight of 6 tons. The registration clerk was said to have mistaken the unladen weight for the laden weight, in consequence of which the driver was registered as a light-vehicle driver,

liable to be called up for military service, instead of as a heavy-vehicle driver who was, therefore, in a reserved occupation. He was summoned for a medical examination by the authorities, but after his employer had lodged an objection it was admitted that a mistake had been made, and it was rectified.

In another case, an under-30 employee was stated to have registered himself simply as a motor driver, without specifying that he was a heavygoods-vehicle driver. As a result, he was summoned for a medical examination preliminary to calling up for military service. After representations by his employer, however, the employee was allowed to remain at his work.

A remarkable instance of inaccurate registration was mentioned by one member who said that his foremanmechanic was registered as a manager of a retail shop.

Another member said two of his firm's employees were wrongly described on registration, due to the registration clerk making a mistake.

Tags

Locations: Bradford

comments powered by Disqus