kward or reward
Page 2
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
NAS abundantly clear at the recent Road Haulage Associan conference that operators are concerned over the next ge round negotiations. The amount of the settlement was t their main concern — that will be dictated by the cash 3 liable — the principle cause of concern was the protracted Jrse negotiations might take.
rhe fragmentation of the industry during negotiations and failure to reach agreement nationally also proved to be ass for concern. Nor were the delegates at all sure that the 'ards would be tied to productivity. Mr Glyn Samuel's advice it profit should be reintroduced to business language surely lie the answer to all the questions and doubts.
s it beyond the wit of the employers to agree a national ifit sharing percentage as the annual wage increase? That uld give the award a national stamp. Since each company's rift is different, so the award would be different company by npany.
ri/ages are paid from profit, profit comes from productivity, Auctivity comes from effort. The award, or should it be yard, would be commensurate with the effort of each emiyee.
rhe National Freight Company's plan to involve its emiyees as shareholders is a sure way to obtain increased aductivity and profitability. An annual ige award linked to profitability another way of achieving
3 same end.