AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Tribunal rejects drivers' appeal

31st January 1991
Page 18
Page 18, 31st January 1991 — Tribunal rejects drivers' appeal
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Four drivers who were made redundant by Kettering-based Royal Blue Transport have failed to win higher redundancy payments by appealing to an industrial tribunal.

They may be entitled to payments in lieu of notice, but following a recent High Court ruling they would have to pursue this with the company or through the County Courts. Industrial tribunals no longer have the jurisdiction to handle such cases.

A Leicester industrial tribunal said that in May 1984 a wage agreement stated that Royal Blue drivers would get £130.50 for a 50-hour week (Monday to Friday). But from 1985 the company reverted to paying a basic weekly wage with an improved overtime rate after 40 hours and drivers did not object.

The drivers told the tribunal that their basic wage was £125.80 for 40 hours, but that their average take-home pay was substantially higher. They maintained that their redundancy pay should have been calculated on their average earnings over the last 12 weeks.

The tribunal said that such a calculation could only be used when there was casual employment or no normal working hours. The drivers were also relying on the 1984 agreement, contending that there was still a contractual arrangement for a guaranteed 50 hours. Wage records showed that they were normally employed for at least 50 hours a week.

The 1984 agreement was only intended to be temporary, said the tribunal. In 1985 a driver's basic wage reverted to 40 hours and that arrangement continued for the next five years so the firm had been right to calculate the redundancy payment on a 40hour week.

Tags

Organisations: High Court
Locations: Kettering

comments powered by Disqus