AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Apex in letter mystery

30th July 1998, Page 12
30th July 1998
Page 12
Page 12, 30th July 1998 — Apex in letter mystery
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Keywords : Apex

by Rob Willock • Wednesbury parcels firm Apex is vowing to root out and sue the author of a rogue letter which invites franchisees to form a breakaway network.

The mystery aggressor, purporting to be from a Midlands solicitors firm called Grindleys, claims to represent a group of six Apex franchisees upset at how the parcels network is being run.

However, Commercial Motor has been unable to trace Grindleys. A Stokeon-Trent firm called Grindeys says it is concerned that someone is impersonating it and confirms: "No one in our offices was connected with this letter whatsoever."

The letter, which was sent from Stoke-onTrent to several of Apex's 75 franchisees, says: "We believe that the depot network within Apex is being denied quality of service and a future by Acclaim Holdings Ltd."

Allegations include: that Acclaim managing director Raymond Giblin is running Apex solely for his benefit; that the company refuses to invest in more trunking vehicles to Scotland and Cornwall; and that hub charges are about to be increased substantially.

The letter also claims that a major backer with a £50m turnover is waiting in the wings to part-finance a breakaway.

But Giblin dismisses the threat, saying no credible solicitor or financial backer would put their names to something so "silly and unprofessional. It's a red herring—I think I know who's behind it. Apex is going from strength to strength and I'm not unduly concerned."

However, Apex's solicitor RA Wilkinson & Co says: "The letter constitutes a libel and also an inducement to our client's depots to break their contracts. Our clients are anxious to take action against the instigator of this letter."

Tags


comments powered by Disqus