1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140 
Charles Burke Owner-driver / truck dealer TRS Engineering Rhonda Valley
Page 31
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
By far the panel's most outspoken opponent of the scheme, Burke remains strongly opposed to drivers being forced to bear the financial burden for offences that. in some cases, MI not be their own fault.
Yet many will end up paying in the probably forlorn hope that they can recoup the cost from their employers later.
"Drivers will feel pressurised [into paying] at the roadside because they want to get on with the job," says Burke.
He also remains opposed to VOSAS extended powers, and believes it undermines the legal foundations on which enforcement of road traffic regulations are based.
The UK used to have a legal system now we've just made VOSA into 'judge and jury'. They may be making a judgement based on a limited amount of technical knowledge,"