1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222 
IN BRIEF
Page 58
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
Roadliner Orders : Home and export orders are already being received for the new Daimler Roadliner 36-ft., rear-engined, single-deck bus chassis which features air suspension and a Cummins V6 engine. One of the first home orders is from the West Riding Automobile 'Co. Ltd., which is taking 10 Roadliners for delivery in mid-I965. Deficit at Oldham: A net deficit of £8,822 resulted from the year's working (ended March 31 last) of the Oldham transport undertaking, compared with a surplus in the previous year of £19,530.
Surplus at Chester : With increased passenger receipts of £214,624 for the year ended March 31 last, Chester transport undertaking had a net surplus of £6,307 (£2,178 in 1963). . . and Wolverhampton : Although running fractionally less mileage in the year ended March 31 last, Wolverhampton transport undertaking had an increased gross surplus of £151,123 (1134,808 in 1963). However, the net surplus of £26,735 was a drop on the previous year's figure of £43,697. Warning on Hull Fares: The general manager of Hull Corporation transport undertaking, Mr. 0, H. Pulfrey, last week warned the transport committee that a policy decision would have to be made soon to meet the ever increasing rates costs of the undertaking, particularly in face of the latest wage claims. He suggested three courses of action: a straightforward fares increase, making the present higher week-end fares applicable throughout the week, which would bring in £74,000; the substitution of East Yorks Motor Services fares, which would bring in an extra £81,000; or to take no action and to continue with assistance from the rates.