1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160 
Absent tacho
Page 25
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
A Hertfordshire firm has been ordered to pay more than £1,000 n fines and costs following confusion over tachograph use. Wilkes Wheels of 1.eavesden, Herts appeared before Hendon magistrates to plead not guilty to using a vehicle when the tachograph was not used and of failing to preserve tachograph records.
Prosecuting for the Vehicle Inspectorate, Anthony Ostrin said that on 11 July last year one of the oompany's vehicles was stopped in a roadside check. The driver, James Lynch, was asked to produce his tachograph record for the current journey but was unable to do so. Director Wiiliam Fonfe said the truck was not a goods vehicle and was being used by a third party at the time. Out rnaOstrates were satisfied that it was a CV and that the company was operating the vehicle.
The company was fined £300 for each offence with £408.30 costs.