1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184 
Digitachs can :ost you an hour a day
Page 24
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
WITH REFERENCE to the article on digitachs (CM 15 March), I too have noticed zonsiderable differences in time driven and the time the digitach in my R420 seems to record.
I've had mine for over a year now, and each time [run with one pf our analogue vehicles there is a wide variation between my vehicle and the older one — sometimes as much as 50 minutes Lin local work where a lot of stopstart driving is involved.
As you would expect, on a long run on good roads the difference Ls marginal, if anything.
Just as the RHA did, we tried tied vehicles back to back (same iob, same day), and a nine-hour day in an analogue truck became 10 hours in a digitach vehicle.
Surely this is wrong because if you don't get any infringements with an analogue tacho, surely you ihouldn't with a digitach when xorking in the same fashion. Dbviously another effect is wages f, as I am, you're on an hourly rate.
Hopefully Brussels will sort it put soon.
Mame supplied, by e-mail