AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Conflicting evidence

29th December 1967, Page 21
29th December 1967
Page 21
Page 21, 29th December 1967 — Conflicting evidence
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

TWO weeks' suspension was the decision of the Scottish deputy Licensing Authority, Mr. L. A. Wells, when he called J. Mitchell and Co. before him under section 178 of the Act last week.

Mr. Wells said he had received information which disclosed that false evidence had been given earlier in the year when the company was granted an A licence variation for an additional vehicle to be acquired.

A 15 per cent discrepancy in the figures presented, as compared with the actual ones, showed that less traffic had been carried. There was still sufficient evidence, said Mr. Wells, for the grant he had made, but whether the error was intentional or not, he felt bound to take action.