iring for Bus in London ?
Page 21
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
T Industrial Correspondent
Inment's decision not to have ip yet in the pay pause could )iggest dislocation of London isport services since the ke of 1926. That is the prosring the decision, briefly last week's issue of The Motor, of the London bus
e out on strike in support of ound train crews. men had decided earlier to n January 29 and on every :er. that if the railway pay settled by then, The decision len, taken overwhelmingly at conference, is ostensibly a void having to cope with lore passengers who normally rground.
e men's leaders said after the Ve are afraid that, if the tube place, conditions on the road ble. This move is sheer self. Otherwise we should not ake people and would get all s. We had it once before, in hat was only a partial rail
id this ostensible reason for the busmen are not unmind)ssible effect of a strike threat ,Cril Transport Executive, who at considering their claim for and improved conditions. A en promised for next month be placed before another nference before the strike
n, the strike threat has yet to by the union's leaders. As
I at the moment they are 1 to sanction an official strike )f the railwaymen's unofficial 3ut once the L.T.E.'s reply is )osition may be changed—for r worse.