AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

More E.E.C. Technical Snags?

28th September 1962
Page 55
Page 55, 28th September 1962 — More E.E.C. Technical Snags?
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

FROM A SPECIAL CORRESPONDENT

'URTHER complications in the longdrawn-out attempts to achieve agreed ights and dimensions limits for vehicles the E.E.C. may possibly arise from the dings of a committee not directly ,ponsible for the E.E.C. Commission's vosals on this main subject of ndardization. As a supplement to the [ncipal weights and dimensions pi:6sals, which have already been drafted,

Commission is to seek from the E.C. Council a directive for unified hicle specifications, dealing with such itters as power-to-weight ratios. lying now decided to present these pplementary proposals in detail early

1963, the Commission, through its ricral transport department, recently pnized a meeting between governmt experts of the member states and was this meeting which brought to ht some new problems. As might be expected, the govern7 mt representatives found that there re often variations between the techal requirements specified by legislation

different member states, but the

important point was the realization that these differences in supplementary technical specifications could influence the determination of limits for vehicle weights and dimensions; it is also thought that these differences could even hinder the free movement of vehicles.

Bases of agreement were established at this first meeting of government experts and a working programme has been set up to try to reach full agreement as quickly as possible; their next meetings, however, are to be on November 26 and 27.

The original dissension between the Six, the refusal of France and Germany to consider the latest E.E.C. weights and dimensions proposals (The Commercial Motor, September 21) and now the possibility that further disagreements on the main proposals may arise through what was intended to be a set of purely supplementary regulations, suggests that a fully agreed set of standardized weights and 'dimensions is even less likely to be reached by January 1, 1963, than seemed possible a few months ago,

Tags


comments powered by Disqus