1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166 
New Tour to Ramsgate?
Page 51
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
DROPOSALS to overate a new tour to Ramsgate were substantially supported by membersof several elderly peoples' clubs and associations. at Leeds last week, when the Yorkshire Traffic Commissioners heard an application by Tetley's Motor Services. The tour was to be of seven or eight days duration and departures would be outside the normal holiday peak periods. Only one vehicle was to be operated on each occasion. In evidence Mr. W. Tetley, the proprietor, stated that he wanted to meet a very real demand which he was sure existed. The case was opposed by Wallace Arnold TOUPS, Ltd., Feather Bros. (fours), Ltd., Heaps Tours, Ltd., East Kent Road Car Co., Ltd., the Yorkshire Pool of Operators and British Railways. Replying to Mr. R. Marshall, for Wallace Arnold, Mr. Tetley said that he realized the objectors operated regularly to the South and South-East coast, but he did not think his new service, if granted, would abstract any passengers from these. They would carry elderly people on the tour and would be prepared to accept the restrictions of licensing to provide a facility which the public reauired.
The case is to be continued.