AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Pallets bring loading fine

28th November 1975
Page 14
Page 14, 28th November 1975 — Pallets bring loading fine
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

LOADING pallets of a size not normally encountered led to an overloading fine for a Co Durham operator in Gateshead magistrates court on Monday.

In the case concerning the unaccustomed pallet sizes, Margaret Rose Kennedy, trading as Rosehill Trucking Cornpany, of Birtley, was the owner of a vehicle observed by a traffic examiner in September and which was diverted to a weighbridge.

Here it was found to exceed the gross plated weight of 11 tons by 1 l4cwt and the permitted weight on the rear axle of 7.5 tons by 1 ton 6cwt. There had been a previous similar conviction in Nottingham in 1974.

The owner was fined £75 for the axle overload and £50 for the gross overload, with £5 advocate's fee.

The driver, Mr G R Pinckney, of Newcastle upon Tyne, was fined £5 on each charge with £5 advocate's fee.


comments powered by Disqus