AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Danger load carrier cleared

28th January 1977
Page 19
Page 19, 28th January 1977 — Danger load carrier cleared
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

CHARGES of using a lorry with a dangerous load -brought against the operator of a box van loaded with chemicals, were drsmissed by Mansion House magistrates' court, London.

The van, belonging to Wormerisey Boo me Chemicals Ltd, had been stopped by City of London police in May on a routine check. At the check it was noticed that a drum was wet at the bottom.

Greater London Council scientific officer attached to the London Fire Brigade, B. Mould said the drum had obviously been stored overnight and had got damp but was not leaking. The load contained potassium hydroxide flake, and carboys of chloros and ammonia.

A petroleum officer was also called out but could find no breaches of regulations. Mr Mould said that he had not carried out experiments with the chemicals involved but accepted that there was no danger involved.

Counsel for the defence, Oliver Popplewell QC, told the court that the matter was important because if found to be proved, grave damage would be done to the Wormersley Boome Chemicals business if it could not carry mixed loads.


comments powered by Disqus