AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

MANCHESTER ROUND

27th May 1966, Page 94
27th May 1966
Page 94
Page 94, 27th May 1966 — MANCHESTER ROUND
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

over the past five years, duly adjusted to compensate for length and weight of vehicle. Whilst the competitors were well satisfied with this arrangement, the intention is that in the future the handicap figure shall be entered in the programme so that the entrants will be able to follow their fortunes more closely.

Penalties on the Highway Code and road route were stiff, but clean sheets were preserved in these cases by J. Roberts (McVitie and Price Ltd.), Bedford, and T. Burns (Remploy Ltd.), Austin, so that they tied for the special award in this section. As a decider the test had to be taken into account and this gave the decision to Roberts. Tate and Lyle Transport Ltd. had two class winners in the persons of F. Pankhurst and H. J. Bramwell to support Isaac, so that they won the team award with 602 penalty points.

Both Class C and Class D finished with single-mark margins. Among the 19-22 footers, S. Swaisland (Springfield Transport Ltd.), Bedford, led S. Vernon (Tate and Lyle Transport Ltd.), Austin, 158-159. Whilst the winner was better on code and road, Vernon proved excellent on the kerb test where his loss was only 8. Bradbury and Isaac's performances in Class D were almost identical except that the latter, after having the advantage on the code, fell back on the kerb test. The venue was the Shell Chemical

Tags

Locations: Austin

comments powered by Disqus