1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236 
Impounded truck cannot be returned to pay off debts
Page 33
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
A PEVENSEY operator, who sought the return of an impounded vehicle to help pay his debts, has had his application rejected by Christopher Heaps,the South Eastern & MetropolitanTraffic Commissioner.
Brian Tingley told the TC he was the registered owner of the vehicle, and that he was going through an Individual Voluntary Agreement as an alternative to bankruptcy. The sale of the vehicle was part of his IVA agreement, and it was in the process of being sold to Paul Scott for £10,000. Scott had cleared the outstanding finance of £68.62. Tingley had allowed Scott to take the vehicle as he had said he had all the relevant licences in place.
Traffic examiner Jeremy Betts said the loaded vehicle had not been displaying an 0-licence disc.The driver had said he was working for Paul Scott. It had been confirmed Scott did not hold an 0-licence and the vehicle was impounded. The vehicle was the subject of a hire purchase agreement between Tingley Independent Traders and Anglo Irish Finance: Tingley Independent Traders was in compulsory liquidation. Refusing to return the vehicle, the TC said it seemed to be owned either by Tingley Independent Traders or by Scott. He had no evidence that it was, or had been, owned by Tingley