AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

B.T.C. Appeal Partly Successful

26th January 1962
Page 36
Page 36, 26th January 1962 — B.T.C. Appeal Partly Successful
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Keywords : Law / Crime

MHEN the appeal of the B.T.C. against W a grant of seven vehicles on A licence to Maynor Transport, Ltd., to •carry musical instruments was resumed before the Transport Tribunal in London last week, Mr. C. R. Beddington, for Maynor, said Mr. A. J. F. Wrottesley, for the B.T.C., had accepted the reasoning of the Licensing Authority, but had said simply that the decision to make the grant was wrong.

Mr. Beddington suggested it would be wrong for the Tribunal to interfere with the decision unless it were shown that the Licensing Authority had overlooked or miscalculated a particular point.

He said that Mr. N. Ragg, managing director of Maynor, was a professional musician and he also had a p.s.v. licence. He had the idea to do this work unpacking a brass instrument on a which became littered with straw packing. The basis of the system r be outward carrying from manufact There was clearly a very subst: volume of traffic which appeare justify a service all over the countr Mr. Ragg's firm, with musician dr handled the instruments there wou much less risk of damage.

In his closing statement Mr. Wrot1 subm:tted that the amount of t needed for the vehicles had not proved.

The President of the Tribunal Hubert Hull, announced that lie would be granted for four veh instead of seven.


comments powered by Disqus