AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Skip truck exempt from tacho regs

26th February 1998
Page 29
Page 29, 26th February 1998 — Skip truck exempt from tacho regs
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• A director of Ashton & Manchester Waste Executive was cleared of a tachograph offence after Manchester City magistrates accepted that a 7.5-tonne mini-skip vehicle carrying domestic waste was exempt from the EC tachograph

John Loftus had denied using the vehicle when the tachograph had not had a six-yearly calibration check. The magistrates heard that the vehicle was stopped in a check in March 1997 after it had collected a skip full of domestic waste from a private household. The prosecution maintained the vehicle was not exempt as it was not engaged on local authority service or under contract with a local authority. It was pointed out that the skip had been provided to the householder for a fee.

Ian Whalley, defending, argued that as long as the service was provided to the public at large then the vehicle was exempt. He pointed out that in the case of Swain vs McCaul the High Court had said that the criterion for inclusion in the exemption was that the service in question was a "general service performed in the public interest".

The magistrates directed that the defence costs should be paid out of public funds.

Tags

Organisations: High Court

comments powered by Disqus