AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Formal warning for tarnished repute

26th August 2004, Page 33
26th August 2004
Page 33
Page 33, 26th August 2004 — Formal warning for tarnished repute
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

NORTH WESTERN Deputy Traffic Commissioner Elizabeth Perrett has described the repute of Workington-based Ian Wilson Haulage as"a little bit grubby with a few linger marks". But the firm escaped with a warning after the DTC decided its repute had not been lost. Eden magistrates had fined the company £2,000 for permitting two weekly rest offences by one driver and three daily rest offences by another.

Director Ian Wilson said the tachograph records were now compared with the drivers' timesheets. If the licence was suspended or curtailed the company would lose business that it would never get back. Wilson would be quite happy to have the tachograph records sent for analysis and to send the drivers on an external training course as soon as possible.

The DTC felt those undertakings should bring the company "up to speed".

For the company, Martin Arthur said it was a typical old Cumbrian family business in which the boys came in at the bottom and worked their way up,leamingfrom their fathers.He felt that Wilson's mistake was in trying to do too much.Taking no action, the DTC commented that there was not one set of rules for Cumbrian family businesses and another set for other operators.

Though the offences were not the most serious she had seen, the company had to get it right.


comments powered by Disqus