Fl ighb ground(
Page 20
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
ALTHOUGH the last in principle is no criterim dundancy selection rule mingham Industrial Tril upheld coach driver Le: ty's claim of unfair d against Flights Coach Tr
The tribunal said all at ers with the exception had less service than M and it had been admit three seasonal drivers h kept on when Mr I■J permanent drivel dismissed.
Chairman and ma director Ken Flight told t nal that because of a fal one driver had to be di last November. Mr Mi selected because pas had banned him from them on their Continent(
In evidence, Mr Mint) he could not recall havi told of any complaints him, but would have bee to take the option of sh working if it had been The first that he knev selection for redundar when he was given a dismissal. He denied sworn at passengers.
For Mr Minty it was ar had been dismissed for other than redundan company had written tc suggesting short-time in an effort to keep the and it was significant Minty did not receive thE There had been no complaints about Mr was claimed and if redur were needed a compai do more than pick the whose face least fitter had been no consultati the drivers concerning dancy.