1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156 
significant time and manpower in combating operations being carried out
24th July 2008, Page 30
24th July 2008
Page 30
Page 30, 24th July 2008
— significant time and manpower in combating operations being carried out
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
without an UK 0-licence but which require one, and where domestic operators suffer anti-competitive activities.
The appellants in this case were caught out because their operations were clearly not infrequent or irregular and the vehicles remained in the UK for long periods.
The recently proposed cabotage changes would in future permit regular, if restricted, cabotage operations, as long as sthere was an international loaded journey, a maximum of three domestic operations or legs, and the vehicle exited the country within seven days.
This could be carried out entirely regularly and, if implemented, a non-UK based operator could cany out UK-based operations in a way not currently permitted. •