AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Get off your high horses

24th February 2005
Page 77
Page 77, 24th February 2005 — Get off your high horses
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

s 380hp enough to haul a 44-tonne artic? it seems that opinions vary...

The used market is unforgiving if a product is considered not to be cutting the mustard, but it seems the jury is still out on whether the 6x2 380hp tractor falls into this category.

Widening residual values between 6x2 380 and 420hp tractors is a direct consequence of the transport industry perceiving the 380hp engine to be too weak for post-40-tonne work.

The step up in GVW from 41 to 44 tonnes is the main catalyst as operators want 10hp per tonne, or as close as possible. Owner-driver Scott Barrett, based in the Midlands, sources as a minimum second-hand 420hp 6x2 tractors for fridge work at 44 tonnes.

"Anything less won't do," he says. "The last 380hp I had, a Volvo FM12, I replaced with a 420hp engine.The difference this brings is better journey times and better fuel consumption, by around 0.5mpg. It saves me money and satisfies my driven."

Barrett reports that other operators and owner-drivers feel the same, but concedes there is a when in Rome' philosophy and isn't willing to drop horsepower as it might reduce his competitiveness.

However, figures from the trade tell a different story. Phil Holmes, used vehicle sale manager for independent Scania franchise Keltruck, working out of Burton on Trent, says demand for 380s has picked up recently as operators realise they will do the job.

He cites the 380's cheaper price tag, by some £4,500, and reckons that while it might lose a few minutes on journey times, the fuel consumption is invariably identical or better, si

Tags

Locations: Rome

comments powered by Disqus