AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Hot dog seller claimed showman's rights

23rd March 2006, Page 32
23rd March 2006
Page 32
Page 32, 23rd March 2006 — Hot dog seller claimed showman's rights
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

USING A vehicle without 0-licence authority has cost a hot dog salesman £1,200 in lines and costs.

Norman Prior,trading as Filling the Gap,of Binfield, Berkshire, pleaded guilty to having no 0licence and failing to use a tachograph when he appeared before the Harlow magistrates.

Anthony Ostrin, prosecuting for VOSA, said a 7.5-tonner driven by Prior had been stopped in a roadside check at North Weald Bassett. The vehicle was loaded with a generator and water bottles. Prior had admitted that he had no 0-licence and was not using the tachograph. He had claimed to be a member of the Showman's Guild and therefore exempt from both the 0-licensing and tachograph regulations. However, he had failed to produce a guild certificate membership number and had been requested to forward a copy of the certificate. No such certificate had been received.

Prior told the magistrates that as he had been driving a vehicle that had been adapted to be a showman's vehicle he had considered himself to be exempt from the regulations.

He said he needed a big vehicle to carry his generator, but accepted that he was a mobile caterer and the vehicle was in fact a hot dog van. He agreed he had been working in the business for more than 10 years without an 0-licence or using the tachograph.

The magistrates tined Prior £1.000 with 1200 costs for having no 0-licence. No separate penalty was imposed for failing to use the tachograph.

Tags

Organisations: Showman's Guild

comments powered by Disqus