AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

More luggage room

22nd November 1968
Page 38
Page 38, 22nd November 1968 — More luggage room
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Salty luggage capacity figures for Duple entries published in the guide to British touring coach bodywork, CM November 8, were incorrect. Correct figures for these models are as follows:

In Group 1 the Viceroy (Bedford VAM) has side luggage accommodation of 49 Cu. ft. and (Ford R192) of 30 Cu. ft. In Group 3 the Commander (Bristol RESH) has an underfloor luggage space of 147 Cu. ft., the Bristol LH and AEC Reliance versions have side accommodation 0120 cu. ft. and the Leyland Leopard version of 15 Cu. ft. The Viceroy in Group 4 has the following luggage accommodation: Bedford VAL-132 Cu. ft, rear, 35 cu. ft. side; Ford R226-140 cu. ft. rear, 45 cu. ft, side. In Group 5 the luggage accommodation for the Commander is as follows: AEC Reliance and Leyland Leopard 128 Cu, ft. rear, 29 and 22 Cu, ft. side respectively; Daimler Roadliner 202 Cu. ft. rear; Bristol RE 785 Cu. ft. rear.

In most cases side locker accommodation is optional.

Tags


comments powered by Disqus