AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Roadside enforcement excluded from plan

22nd March 2007, Page 6
22nd March 2007
Page 6
Page 6, 22nd March 2007 — Roadside enforcement excluded from plan
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

ISSUING PROHIBITIONS at the roadside may not be a part of the outsourcing proposal.

A presentation made to Vosa staff at a monthly meeting in March suggested that routine enforcement -operatorf leet checks, vehicle examinations, and test centre visits-could be included in the PPP option with roadside enforcement support.

However, stopping trucks for roadside checks would be "out of scope", the presentation suggests, as would vehicle impounding and targeted enforcement. Routine enforcement and support are seen as a "grey area".

Vasa has always predicted that all regulation, monitoring and standards would remain under its direct control, but this is the first time that roadside enforcement has not appeared as a privatisation option. Possibly it has been removed in response to public safety concerns.

The only part of the list marked "sale option" is testing-the disposal of test stations has long been mooted as a solution tothe extensive refurbishment and overhaul of locations that is needed.

While the trade unions remain concerned that privatising any part of vehicle enforcement and testing could compromise road safety, Vosa is adamant that safety will remain a key criterion, along with quality of service.

It says that if the minister chooses the PPP route, little will change during the procurement process which would take at least two years.

Tags


comments powered by Disqus