Lelia eat 5ag fink mut bik
Page 39
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
Ltittatilf• ligett• • •
I feel that "The Hawk," writing about tachographs in the July 1 issue of CM, is labouring under a very uerious misapprehension when he suggests that the rank and file members of the unions are not against the fitting of tachos.
The fact that two men, out of the hundreds of thousands of professional lrivers, union or non-union, lappen to wish to work in 3errnany, is hardly any :riterion though, of course, they are entitled to their own opinion.
Also, what does "The Hawk" mean when he refers to the "benefits" which would accrue from the use of his obnoxious instrument?
I, too, read the article 'bout Cordes & Simon, a 'km run on what appears to oe military lines in the best reutonic tradition no doubt tory efficient. But how many 3ritish drivers have the emperament to work in this .egimental fashion? I, for one certainly have not, nor opparently do any of my :olleagues, so we will :ontinue to support the opposition to the "Spy in the
Eugene George Corke .ondon W13.
D Who said there were only 'wo applications? — Editor,