AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

A Licence for C.

22nd February 1957
Page 29
Page 29, 22nd February 1957 — A Licence for C.
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

I F a full-time haulier with an A-licence trunk fleet could justify the authorization of a collection and delivery vehicle, he was entitled to art A licence, Mr: Edward Jones, on behalf of W. Hales. Ltd., Liverpool, told the North Western Deputy Licensing Authority, Mr. J. R. Lindsay, at Liverpool, on Tuesday. The company were applying to add a vehicle of 21 tons unladen and a trailer of 2I tons to their A licence.

The British Transport Commission; Mr, H. Parker, Bootle; Mr. T. W. Roberts, Bootle; J. Fielding (Liverpool), .Ltd.; Collingwood Haulage, Ltd., Lives:pool, and Merseyside Carriers objected.

Mr. Jones said the application was mainly for collection in the Liverpool area for five trunk vehicles carrying fruit and provisions to Yorkshire and the north-east coast. Traders had coin. plained about timing.

The company had made an alternative application for a B licence. The application for a trailer was on account of fuel rationing.

Mr. G. H. P. Beanies, for the British Transport Commission, said that they would not object to an A licence if the vehicle were given a normal user for collection and delivery in Liverpool.

For the other objectors, Mr. H. D. Mace said the B.T.C. were interested only in the trunk route, but the fruit


comments powered by Disqus