AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

In CM July 25 you stated that Trade Licences may

22nd August 1975, Page 34
22nd August 1975
Page 34
Page 34, 22nd August 1975 — In CM July 25 you stated that Trade Licences may
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

issued only to motor ders as defined in the hide (Excise) Act 1971. !lowing an unsuccessful 3iication as a haulage convtor I formed a company a motor trader, re-applied was again refused, hough the DoE agreed that new business complied th their definition of a itor trader. Where have ne wrong ?

The DoE says that it must be satisfied that there is fficient business to justify a issue of a trade licence. le Department suggests at an applicant should erate on normal road tax r six or 12 months and en send documentary evince of turnover with the iplication. They could not y what might be conlered "sufficient business."

I understand that further grounds for the revocaDri, suspension or curtailent of an operator's licence zve now been added to SecDn 69 of the Transport Act )68. Could you say what tese are?

I. Section 16 and paragraph 4 of Schedule 4 of the oad Traffic Act 1974 exmded the powers of the icensing Authorities under ection 69 of the Transport .ct 1968 to revoke, curtail r suspend an operator's cence.

The new grounds on which ction can be taken are ffences concerning plating . ertificates and goods vehicle ast certificates and failing to onform to regulations made bout lorry routes.

Powers were also given to he LAs in the same pare;mph to terminate an operaor's licence on a date earlier han that on which it would therwise have expired under ;ection 67 of the 1968 Act that section which deals vith licence duration).

Tags


comments powered by Disqus