1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176 
LA not impressed
Page 47
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
• James S. McCallum of Edinburgh, operating one vehicle, had it suspended for one month, the whole of October, in Edinburgh last week. He failed to appear at a previous hearing in July and had not contacted the Edinburgh office to explain that failure, That, said Mr A. B. Bimie the Scottish LA could have resulted in immediate loss of his licence. He had been leniently dealt with.
Mr McCallum admitted a series of convictions since 1970 including use of vehicle without authorization, failure to carry records and, again, unauthorized use of a vehicle. Giving decision Mr Birnie said there were two things he had to bear in mind; he was not impressed by the operator's demeanour or casual attitude but what he was there for was a number of specified convictions. He had also to accept that the worst of the convictions happened two years before. He would suspend the licence for one month; in that month the operator would have no vehicle authorized for operation.