AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

APPEAL RULINGS MONTHS OVERDUE

21st February 1936
Page 54
Page 54, 21st February 1936 — APPEAL RULINGS MONTHS OVERDUE
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

pONSIDERABLE inconvenience has

been caused to coach operators in Yorkshire by the unexplained delay in the issue of the Minister of Transport's decisions concerning a number of York: shire appeals heard so long ago as last September and October. The appeals chiefly concern two points.

One is whether long-date-tour operators should be permitted to run to one holiday resort and then make that the base for day. excursions. •At the heartug of the appeals, counsel for the appellant railway companies suggested that this arrangement amounted to " an express service in disguise." .

The other point relates to appeals by a number of tour operators in Yorkshii e against the granting of permission to Lancashire operators to pick up passengers in certain. Yorkshire towns.

The delay has held up decisions by the Yorkshire Commissioners.

Tags

Locations: York

comments powered by Disqus