AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

?striction atchdogs

20th June 1981, Page 26
20th June 1981
Page 26
Page 26, 20th June 1981 — ?striction atchdogs
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

f readers can rest assured that ! watchdogs are already 3ping a close watch on the !aping proliferation of lorry trictions (Editorial, May 16). :very proposal — they

3rage 3040 a week — is 3cked by FTA's central and pional traffic staff. We find it 3essary to take action, ranging

m discussions with the local :hority to full use of the tutory objection procedures, about ten per cent of the ;es.

knd these figures would be nificantly higher if it were not the fact that most local :horities consult us about 5sible effects on trade and lustry before publishing ban )posals, n addition each month we blish a "Traffic Digest" listing )posed schemes and setting t the results of FTA action. )ne of our main worries in area is the whittling away 3r the years of the statutory eguards for operators rtained in traffic legislation. .big problem is the

(peri mental scheme" which esteps the need for a public luiry and can last for up to 18 inths.

Tags


comments powered by Disqus