AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

90-ton low-loader switch

20th December 1968
Page 27
Page 27, 20th December 1968 — 90-ton low-loader switch
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• On an undertaking being given that the pattern of work would remain unchanged and only one low-loading trailer, capable of carrying 90 tons, would be in use at any one time, Mr. T. H. Campbell Wardlaw, appearing for Sunter Bros. Ltd., Siddle C. Cook Ltd. and Robert Wynn and Sons Ltd. told the Yorkshire LA, Mr. H.E. Robson at Leeds on Monday that the objections would not be pursued. Elliott (Hauliers) Ltd., of Rufforth near York, succeeded on an A-variation application to delete one trailer (251 tons) drawbar or low-loader and add one trailer (32 tons) drawbar, low-loader or flat. The normal user attached to the licence was specified as: "plant, machinery, abnormal indivisible loads, England, Scotland and Wales". An objection by BRS (Pickfords) had previously been withdrawn.

In making the grant Mr. Robson said he had noted the undertaking given and felt the new trailer would be a considerable advantage to road safety.

For applicant, Mr. P. Kenny referred to the new trailer as a very heavy class of low

loader, very modern, on 12 wheels front and rear and having steerable bogies. It cost £28,000.

Tags

Locations: York, Leeds

comments powered by Disqus