1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172 
Grant—and A Warning
Page 48
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
I AM going to take a chance and say your application can be granted." This was said by Mr. J. R. C. SamuelGibbon, Western Licensing Authority, to Mr. D. M. Fox, of Bridgwater, who appeared at a Bristol inquiry last week. Fox was answering a case under Section 178 of the Road Traffic Act involving contravention of normal user of his A licence. Appearing for Fox, Mr. M. McGregorJohnson said that accusations relating to distances in excess of 100 miles were admitted. Fox agreed he made regular visits to Hull. 210 miles away, among
(fl other places outside his normal user, but said he understood that occasional journeys outside the radius were permitted.
It was established on behalf of Fox that the long-distance journeys had become less in number and frequency. He told the LA that he now knew better. The application by Fox for a new licence with a 200-mile radius included in the normal user was heard concurrently. Fox Was warned by the LA that a re-appearance would probably mean the loss of his licence. There would be no question of a suspension.