AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

44-tonne VED fiasco

1st March 2001, Page 7
1st March 2001
Page 7
Page 7, 1st March 2001 — 44-tonne VED fiasco
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• Confusion at the DVLA over re-taxing vehicles has left some hauliers with a choice of running illegally or parking up trailers. Last month several hauliers up-plated their vehicles to take advantage of the 44-tonne weight limit. But those who were given the flexibility to operate at different weights and configurations are now running into problems.

Bob Stacey, at the RHA, explains: "The problems arise as vehicles come up for re-taxing or when registering new ones." Hauliers who had paid £1,875 to run at 38-41 tonnes were automatically allowed to up-plate to 44 tonnes, as VED for 44 tonnes is lower (£1,475).

This meant hauliers could operate in both weight categories with different configurations. However, as vehicles come up for re-taxing, the DVLA says it has no mechanism to deal with this. On presentation of a 44 tonne plating certificate the DVLA can only charge the 44 tonne tax rate—it cannot accept the higher 38-41 tonne tax payment. Stacey adds: "Luckily nobody's been stopped on the roads yet, but clearly it's a question to which we don't have a satisfactory answer."

A Department of Transport spokesman says; "We are looking at this; it's one of the objectives of the consultation on VED structure. We'll be making an announcement shortly."

Tags

People: Bob Stacey

comments powered by Disqus