AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Port surcharges trucks for security

1st July 2004, Page 13
1st July 2004
Page 13
Page 13, 1st July 2004 — Port surcharges trucks for security
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

CONTAINER HAULIERS at Felixstowe, already hit by long delays at the port, are now facing extra charges as part of a new security system.

The Port of Felixstowe is introducing the International Ship and Port Security code (ISPS) and intends to charge hauliers a "security surcharge" to cover the costs.

The Freight Transport Association has attacked the move, saying the surcharge should be included in the normal cost charged to shipping lines and not be billed to those who do not even have contracts with the port.

Andrew Rail!, FTA head of transport security policy, says many of its members are finding it increasingly difficult to refuse to pay the additional security charge: "Discussions have already been held with the European Commission, raising our concerns about the consequences of this on competition, the undermining of the security regulations itself and its possible impact on the supply-chain security proposals expected later this year. We will continue to examine the legality of the surcharge."

A spokeswoman for Felixstowe port says: "We have sought at all times to maintain a transparent not discriminatory security charge with our customers. We believe that we have taken a proportionate and reasonable response towards sanctions."

ISPS, which comes into force on 1 July, provides an international framework to detect and assess security threats affecting port facilities. About 120 countries have signed up to the agreement, which outlines regulations for cargo handling and access to restricted zones within ports.


comments powered by Disqus