1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198 
When assessing this type of vehicle, a certain perspective has
Page 67
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
to be maintained. After all, if you demand a vast amount of space and don't intend to use a tachograph then certain areas have to involve sacrifice. In this case it means skimping on cab space and driving characteristics. So with this in mind it has to be said that the Dyna is a cut above the average box-carrier. From a driving perspective it does what all good commercial vehicles do and shrinks in size when on the road. Anc that engine really is impressive, providing ample torque for it not to seem ponderous and smooth enough not to intrude too much, considering it is just inches from your rear.
When it comes to space it really takes some beating. Whether the rear can be completely filled without exceeaing the suggested payload is another matter, although were sure there will be someone out there who will try. And if it's good enough for Toyota's Grand Prix drivers then it should be good enough for mere mortals.