AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

cal content id Britain

19th February 1983
Page 71
Page 71, 19th February 1983 — cal content id Britain
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

RITE with reference to

lancial Market' by George lcolm which appeared in mmercial Motor February 5.

Malcolm appears to have 3construed the comments I ide concerning Volvo at a ent Leyland Trucks

Aributor Conference. I am lcerned about the growing ficulties UK buyers — in many ds — face in determining ctly which are genuine tish-made products. Judging recent correspondence in the :dia, this concern is shared by my businessmen.

rhe issue is really one of local qtent. Leyland has a range of )ducts which are at least the ual of commercial vehicles ide by our British and ropean competitors. Also, )re than 97 per cent of the Aerials we use to manufacture Icks and buses are purchased Britain.

f foreign manufacturers wish be recognised as British, their Dducts must have a significant itish content. Only in this way

will employment and industry in Britain truly benefit. As I said in my letter to the Financial Times on January 27, it would be unreasonable to expect foreign manufacturers to match the high local content standards of indigenous companies like Leyland.

However, in establishing an acceptable standard, one must clearly take into account the local content standards of domestic manufacturers. The current standard set by the SMMT — namely that 50 per cent of the value of a vehicle should be British — is far too low.

strongly support the policy of buying British and wish to ensure that buyers are not led into believing that products are British when most certainly are not. British buyers should not be satisfied with a half pint in a pint pot!

R. J. HANCOCK

Chairman of the Leyland Group

Tags


comments powered by Disqus