AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Truckit 247

19th April 2012, Page 22
19th April 2012
Page 22
Page 22, 19th April 2012 — Truckit 247
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

Keywords : Business / Finance

A recent Transport Tribunal decision upheld the revocation of the O-licence of Reading operator Truckit 247 by western traffic commissioner (TC) Sarah Bell in November 2011. It provides a reminder of the consequences should an operator be unable to demonstrate to the TC that they have sufficient financial standing.

Truckit 247 was granted an O-licence authorising the use of one vehicle and one trailer in April 2010, subject to it demonstrating, by producing three months’ bank statements, that it had access to £8,100 (therefore satisfying the requirement to be of the appropriate financial standing) by October 2010.

The operator provided bank statements in December 2010, but these did not show access to the required sum. In June 2011, the Office of the Traffic Commissioner requested original bank statements for the period from March until June 2011.

The average balance over the three-month period was £6,690, not the £8,100 required. Truckit 247’s Operator’s Licence was revoked on the basis that it had failed to demonstrate that it satisfied the requirement to be of the appropriate financial standing. Since that decision, a new O-licence has been granted to Truckit following a fresh application.

Tags

People: Sarah Bell
Locations: Reading

comments powered by Disqus