Insufficient Work Mr. Pritchard Jones submitted that existing hauliers in
18th October 1957, Page 47
18th October 1957
Page 47
Page 47, 18th October 1957
— Insufficient Work Mr. Pritchard Jones submitted that existing hauliers in
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
Keywords :
Penygroes, Law / Crime
the district had not sufficient work. There were vehicles at other villages in the vicinity, all of which could do the work.
Mr. J. Parry, Penygroes, in evidence, said he had not been offered work since he took over the Carmel vehicle because the applicant was getting it all irregularly; Mr. Whitehead pointed out that no notice had been given that there were to be allegations of irregularities. They appeared to be deliberate inventions to sway the issue.
Mr. Lindsay commented that the case would be decided on the evidence of need, but if there were proof of irregularity it would be investigated. The application was refused.