AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Sheep had no 1

18th November 1999
Page 11
Page 11, 18th November 1999 — Sheep had no 1
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

certification

A haulier has been fined £4.000 after being found guilty of moving sheep without the correct documentation.

David Ashley Holmes (trading as DA Holmes, of Wingerworth, Chesterfield) was the operator of a threedecked articulated vehicle stopped as part of a random vehicle check in June 1998, Birmingham magistrates were told. The load of 256 sheep from Taunton was bound for markets in Birmingham and Derby.

Holmes pleaded not guilty to the charges and represented himself.

He was fined £2,000 for failing to ensure an animal transport certificate had been made out—an offence under the Welfare of Animals (Transport) Order 1997.

He was fined a further £2,000 for failing to ensure that a sheep identification document was on board.

Holmes was ordered to pay costs of £1,035. A third charge, concerning the driver's lack of knowledge about the load, was dropped.

In January. Holmes was disqualified from keeping sheep for three years, ordered to undertake 150 hours of community service and ordered to pay costs of £3,000 in a case brought by Derbyshire County Council.

Tags

Organisations: Derbyshire County Council
Locations: Birmingham, Derby

comments powered by Disqus