AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Persistent failures hang absent firm

18th May 2000, Page 21
18th May 2000
Page 21
Page 21, 18th May 2000 — Persistent failures hang absent firm
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• A Merseyside haulage company lost its licence when it failed to attend a Trafford disciplinary inquiry before North Western Deputy Traffic Commissioner Patrick Mulvenna.

Ellesmere Port-based Handleys Transport had been called before the Deputy TC because of concern over its maintenance record and a series of convictions for vehicle excise duty offences. The company held a licence for eight vehicles and eight trailers.

The Deputy IC said that an offer to surrender the licence had been rejected because of the potential threat to roadusers safety.

Vehicle examiner Roger Byron said that during a roadside check in December a trailer was given an immediate prohibition for a significant maintenance failure because a sideguard was about to fall off. The tractor was also given an immediate prohibition for three defects.

Byron imposed an immediate prohibition on one vehicle for a leaking brake valve in January. The inspection records and the driver defect reporting system were ineffective.

Revoking the licence, the Deputy IC said that in the past five years 14 prohibitions had been issued to the company's vehicles and trailers.

Tags

Locations: Ellesmere Port

comments powered by Disqus