AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Evidence not received from police

18th May 1995, Page 30
18th May 1995
Page 30
Page 30, 18th May 1995 — Evidence not received from police
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

• A charge of using a vehicle without insurance against Milton Keynesbased PBI International Freight Services was dropped by the prosecution, but Wigan Magistrates fined the driver 2400 with 225 costs. Paul Baxter, of Radcliffe Way, Northolt admitted using a vehicle without insurance and failing to produce his driving licence or to give his name and address and that of his employer to the police. In a letter to the Court, Baxter said that the Leyland box von he had been driving when stopped by the police at Orrell on the M6 had been hired by the company he worked for. Because of that he had not realised it was not insured. At the time he had been having personal problems which caused him to move house and the failure to produce his documents had been an oversight due to the move. He realised that he should have been more co-operative. Withdrawing the charge against the company, Jane Dagnall, prosecuting, said that the CPS had not received the necessary evidence from the police, despite a number of requests.


comments powered by Disqus