AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

laulier must wait

18th January 1986
Page 13
Page 13, 18th January 1986 — laulier must wait
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

IAULIER, who together his driving examiner was convicted last May iaking a false statement to in an operator's licence, to wait to see if he will licence.

oel Pilliner, trading as l's Transport of BromL, Hereford, had applied a national licence for two des and trailers, his wife being nominated as the sport manager.

ist May, his father Leo1 Pilliner, a Department of isport driving examiner, fined $250 for making a : statement and Noel Pil

• a similar amount for aidand abetting his father f, May 11 1985). Noel Pilliner was subsequ en t y fined 3:5 3 0 by Hereford magistrates fincausing drivers to make false entries in tachograph charts and permitting excessive hours.

For Noel Pilliner, John Francis said that originally his father was going to have been a partner in the business, but his full-time DTp job prevented this.

An application was made showing Leonard Pilliner as the nominated transport manager, so that he would help his son and train his daughter-in-law to do the administration and obtain a Certificate of Professional Competence.

There were contracts avail

able and they wanted to get organised as quickly as possible.

The father is no longer part of the business which is now run solely by Noel Railer and his wife, who holds a CPC of her own.

The false records offences arose after drivers reached the end of their permitted hours and had put charts into the tachographs bearing someone else's name.

Reserving ,decision after examining statements produced, West Midlands Licensing Authority Ronald Jackson said he required more financial in before he could grant the application.


comments powered by Disqus