1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160 
Careless driver banned by Bell
Page 26
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
A Carlisle truck driver with a four-year history of crashes, careless driving and convictions for tachograph offences has been banned from driving Hffils ter five years by North Western Traffic Commissioner Beverley Bell.
When Barry Fearn, who works for LGH Logistics (CM 15-21 August). appeared before the TC, she was told that in 1998 he
P re,
had been convicted of passing through a red light. In March 200(1 he was convicted of drivIN without due care, and in October of that year he was involved in an accident In the Netherlands, where he ran into a ditch and wrote off his vehicle. In March 2001 he failed to produce a tachograph record to police and an examination of his charts for that month revealed 12 hours and tacho offences. In June 2001 a check by a traffic examiner revealed more of these offences.
In January Foam n was involved in an accident in Cambridgeshire when he ran into another HUY. When police examined his vehicle there was no chart in the tachograph. Foamn had told them that he had stopped for a cup of tea shortly before the widen and checked his tachograph record so per flaps he had not closed the head properp lie told the TC that he had left LOH an had "a dream of a job", adding that i would be hard for him to find anythin else at his age.
Revoking Foam's HGli licence, Bell sai his conduct as a professional driver ha been questioned seven times in fou years. It was a serious case and th action taken had to reflect that serious ness. The law did not allow her to take int account the effect of revocation on th driver's personal circumstances.