AT THE HEART OF THE ROAD TRANSPORT INDUSTRY.

Call our Sales Team on 0208 912 2120

Conclusion The saving made from buying second-hand rather than new

16th March 2006, Page 64
16th March 2006
Page 64
Page 64, 16th March 2006 — Conclusion The saving made from buying second-hand rather than new
Close
Noticed an error?
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.

Which of the following most accurately describes the problem?

may not be megabucks, but it could make you more competitive. The main benefit is that you don't have to pay as much up front-between a third and a fifth of the amount, depending on age. This is a significant reduction in the financial burden, particularly if you are having to borrow.

It's true your running costs are likely to be more with a second-hand vehicle, but you are spreading the cost more evenly over the period the vehicle is in your hands, paying back a larger proportion of its whole-life cost while it's earning.

Our figures suggest that despite huge depreciation after the first year, a threeyear-old is the better buy. But remember: whatever the vehicle and its age, both the initial price and the estimated residual value have a significant bearing on the whole-life cost. Residuals fluctuate with market demand and can be unreliable. If you keep the vehicle a bit longer, assume on a zero residual and still manage to get a few thousand quid for it at the end of the day, then look on it as a bonus!

Acknowledgements These comparisons are based on the tables of truck operating costs published by our sister magazine, Motor Transport.

Leeds-based CAP Motor Research supplied the second-hand retail and trade prices; the vehicle insurance quotation came from Southampton-based One Business Insurance Services.

Tags

Locations: Southampton, Leeds

comments powered by Disqus