1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210 
The final countdown reveals a 32point gap between top and
Page 49
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
bottom rankings. The fact that a product as excellent as Volvos FH12 should be placed fourth indicates the pace of truck development and the high standard of the trucks that entered.
Volvo's 816 points was largely a result of the FH 12's weight and its engine, which is competent but unremarkable.
We'd hoped for a better showing from the Scania after its International Truck of the Year award, but sadly the calculator only awards it 823 points. A mixed, but generally favourable showing from the Mere gives 11 837 points.
With 848 points to its credit the MAN TGAs winning margin is almost entirely attributable to its new 020 engine. It turns what had become merely an average truck into an exceptional one. Extremely good in all situations, it gets even better when the going gets tougher.