Revocation hinges on visit of examiner
Page 28
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
TAMES Glanville and Son Ltd., of Redid.
Surrey, was called before the Metropolitz Licensing Authority, Mr. D. I. R. Muir, la week to show why its C licence should not 1 revoked following the imposition of prohit tion notices on seven out of its eight vehicle .1.4r. J. P. Glanville, managing directc said his firm was a timber merchant and ir porter and the use of the vehicles was essenti to its business. On the advice of an Mc inspector, the firm had introduced a new mai tenance system. He produced, as evident some of the records now being kept.
The LA said that it was clear insufficie attention had been paid to maintenance. I would send an examiner to see whether the r commended maintenance system had been p into operation. He reserved his decision pendil the examiner's report.
ILLNESS CHECK
A HEAVILY contested application Maurice James Transport Ltd., of Covent for 125 vehicles on A licence was adjourr at Warwick on Wednesday without be started—because the applicant's princi witness could not appear through Hine There arc 26 objectors, including Brit Railways. Maurice James has 175 vehic on Contract A and on B Licences.