1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186 
Questions over Galileo viability
Page 9
If you've noticed an error in this article please click here to report it so we can fix it.
THE TRANSPORT SELECT Committee has called on the government to do everything it can to prevent the European Galileo satellite navigation programme going ahead in its current form.
The committee argues that rigorous cost-benefit analysis must he produced to vouch for the continued merits of the project.
It is also concerned by the European Commission's plans to transfer several billion euros from other EC budgets to fund the project.
Committee chairman Gwyneth Dunwoody says:"What taxpayers in the UK and other European countries really need and want are better railways and roads, not giant signature projects in the sky providing services we already have from GPS and other systems."
Galileo will ultimately have 30 satellites. hut so far only one has been launched even though the programme was initially due to be completed by next year; it is currently five years behind schedule.
Dunwoody adds: "The government must stop this folly and bring the EC to its senses. We must have independent and up-to-date evidence that proceeding with Galileo is worthwhile and if it can be demonstrated that it offers good value for taxpayers' money, any decision on funding must be based on the sound management of EU budgets."